top of page

R'PSYC 2021

Sponsored by UCR Psychology Department, Psi Chi, and the Council on Undergraduate Research

3rd Annual Psychology Undergraduate Research Conference
Faculty Advisors: Dr. Kalina Michalska

Save the Date! R'PSYC 2021 will be held May 27th 2-5 PM

Mass Email Flyer.png

R'Psyc 2021 Program

Attached below is the program for R'Psyc 2021. There you will find the zoom link to attend the event as well as the schedule and panelists' highlights.
Click below to open this PDF in a new tab.

Awards

R'Psyc 2021

Undergraduate Research Award: Neuroscience/Cognition

Sensory Processing Impairment is Correlated with Social Cognition Deficits in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

Lauren Tran, Noorhan Rahmatullah, Omar Abu-Wishah, Jessica Robledo, Anubhuti Goel Ph.D.

Undergraduate Research Award: Social

Identifying at Risk Groups for Decreases in Social Connection Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic

Yuritza Escalante, Eleanor Collier, Brent Hughes Ph.D.

Undergraduate Research Award: Developmental

Childhood Racism and Oppositional Behavior: Examining the Role of Skin Color and Gender

Oretioluwasefunmi Agbelusi, Jessie Bridgewater, Tuppett Yates Ph.D.

Undergraduate Research Award: Personality

Violating the Norm: Religiosity and Moral Foundation Preferences in COVID-19 Memes

Darian Dik, Idalis Rivera-Ramirez, Meiyu Huang, Sarah Knapp, Kate Sweeny Ph.D.

Best Novel Research Question: Neuroscience/Cognition

Sensory Processing Impairment is Correlated with Social Cognition Deficits in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome

Lauren Tran, Noorhan Rahmatullah, Omar Abu-Wishah, Jessica Robledo, Anubhuti Goel Ph.D.

Best Novel Research Question: Social

Psychological Experiences with Gambling 

Alvin Josh Zafra, Kate Sweeny, Ph.D.

Best Novel Research Question: Developmental

Too Much of a Good Thing: The Link Between Girls’ Empathy and Depression is Influenced by Psychophysiology and Parent Neuroticism

Purnima Qamar, Dana Glenn, Kalina Michalska Ph.D.

Best Novel Research Question: Personality

Violating the Norm: Religiosity and Moral Foundation Preferences in COVID-19 Memes

Darian Dik, Idalis Rivera-Ramirez, Meiyu Huang, Sarah Knapp, Kate Sweeny Ph.D. 

Commitment to Diversity Award

Childhood Racism and Oppositional Behavior: Examining the Role of Skin Color and Gender

Oretioluwasefunmi Agbelusi, Jessie Bridgewater, Tuppett Yates Ph.D.

Most Promising Real-World Implications

Motivated Seeing: How Partisan Bias Can Skew Evidence Acquisition

Kimia Shamsian, Brent Hughes Ph.D.

Most Innovative Methodology

Saving Memo: Towards an Ecologically Valid Test of Working Memory

Amahyrani Pina, Yvette Chen, Mari Hayashi, Morgan Gomez, Mark Philipp, Anja Pahor, Aaron Seitz Ph.D.

R'PSYC 2021 - Keynote by Dr. Aerika Brittian Loyd
Watch Now
R'PSYC 2021 - Changes with Covid Panel
Watch Now
Proactive or Predatory?: A Regional Examination of the Policing of Black Youth
04:58
Yssis Davis

Proactive or Predatory?: A Regional Examination of the Policing of Black Youth

James Tate LeBlanc, Yssis Davis, and Aerika Brittian Loyd, Ph.D Recent, high-profile murders of Black Americans by police underscore the need to continue examining police practices in the U.S. Proactive policing, the strategic use of police-initiated contact (e.g., police stops) against individuals deemed “at risk” for criminogenic behavior, has been shown to be pervasive in disadvantaged communities, disproportionately targets Black youth, and leads to psychosocial distress among Black youth (Del Toro et al, 2019; Nordberg, Crawford, Praetorius, & Hatcher, 2016). Supporters of proactive policing strategies cite evidence of deterrence against future justice involvement (e.g., arrests; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018). However, studies using officer-reported data to examine these possible deterrence effects remain limited. The California Racial Identity Profiling Act of 2015 (RIPA) was passed partly to address this empirical gap and increase law enforcement transparency. In the current study, we leveraged data from RIPA and the U.S. Census Bureau to analyze police practices against youth in Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Officers reported making 1,976 stops of youth perceived to be aged 5-17 during the data collection period (July to December 2018). Hierarchical linear regression analyses revealed that youth stops in the summer predicted an increase of youth arrests in the winter. Moreover, Black youth were overrepresented in police stops (23%) and incidents of police aggression (27%; e.g., firearm pointed, baton used) compared to their constituency in the general population (8%). Our findings suggest that police stops do not prevent future arrests among youth. Additional implications of the findings are discussed.

Committee heads

R'PSYC%20CH1_edited.jpg
R'PSYC%20CH2_edited.jpg
R'PSYC%20CH4_edited.jpg
R'PSYC%20CH3_edited.jpg
bottom of page